Advert
Advertise with us
Ajay Jagota, KIS Lettings
Ajay Jagota, KIS Lettings

Is affordable housing history?

As the Government continues to try to steer the country out of recession, a worrying report has revealed the real financial implications of the coalition’s affordable homes programme.

The report published by the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee outlines serious concerns that a huge drop in Government grants for affordable homes will leave social housing providers with no alternative than to recover their build costs by putting rents up.

North East lettings expert, Ajay Jagota, fears the affordable homes programme has been yet another headline-grabbing ploy that has no real ability to deliver.

Ajay, managing director of KIS Lettings, said: “The Government has said that it will build 80,000 affordable new homes in the four years from April 2011 to March 2015, but the reality is the £1.8 billion set aside averages to just £20,000 – which is only a third of the funding that was available under the previous scheme.

“The Government expects social housing providers to make up for the lower grant, in part, by charging tenants higher rents. So, what should have been affordable homes to rent or buy may only be accessible to those that have a higher wage or those on the highest benefits, the poorest may not benefit at all from the scheme.”

The report estimates that higher social housing rents demanded as a result of the current affordable homes programme will push the Housing Benefit bill up by £1.4 billion over the next 30 years. It criticises the Government for switching costs from one department to another and is skeptical over whether there will be any real benefit in the long term.

There’s also criticism that the programme will account for just 2 percent of the affordable homes needed and most of them will not be built until the final year of the scheme. With 4.5 million people already waiting for an affordable home, the report calls on the Government to make it clear how the growing need for social housing will be met.

Ajay added: “The social housing shortage is growing and something needs to be done now to prepare for the future. In places like overcrowded London we are already seeing families being made to live in hostels and bed and breakfasts because there is no alternative accommodation and with the welfare cuts due in April, things are not going to get any better.

“What the report doesn’t address is the real problem – the availability of credit. Earlier this year, the Government announced that property developers no longer have to include social housing on new developments if it wasn’t financially viable. But even that announcement hasn’t created the construction boost that was expected.

“The fundamental problem for the property sector is the inability to access credit. Whether it’s an individual looking to move onto the property ladder and secure a mortgage or a housing developer looking to build a whole estate, they need access to credit and the banks are still very reluctant to give it.

“I’m not saying that we should be going back to the days of 120 percent mortgages but there needs to reach a happy medium between what we had then and what we have now.

“I agree with the many top economists that say construction is key to kickstarting the faltering economy, it creates jobs, new social housing and makes more homes available for first time buyers. We just need the banks back on board in order to get things moving.”

#North East #funding #government #property

Have your say

3 responses

Steve Hemingway

Steve Hemingway

The problem is not availability of credit, or of government subsidies. It is the constriction on the supply of properties. There are no affordable homes in the USA: regular family homes can be bought or rented by those on modest incomes. The UK approach is to constrict supply via planning, which increases the cost of land, then impose a tax on development via Sect 106 planning gain agreements on housebuilders, in the form of obligations to build ‘affordable homes’. The end result is a terrific under-production and excess prices. Bizarrely, all parties seem to want to increase the flow of credit which will have the consequence of making homes less affordable for everyone. Apart from the non-doms who are in the happy position of being untaxed if the move here.
Ged Parker

Ged Parker

Given the scale of house building and refurbishment that is needed the obvious policy solution is to start another new towns programme, but be aware of what this implies; designated areas of hundreds if not thousands of hectares- much of them greenfields,  a public sector building programme, and long term public borrowing (though its never been cheaper to so).  Sadly I am not optimistic this will be seriously considered as witnessed by the non-start of Labour’s eco-towns. What solutions are discussed are but temporary patches
Ajay

Ajay

Thank you very much for your comments ged and steve the comments you make are valid and highlights the complexity of trying to resolve the current situation.

Advertisement

Advert

MORE NEWS

More

Advertisement

Advert

MORE IN Industrials

More