Partner Article
Deloitte against plans to scrap degree classifications
The proposal to possibly phase out degree classifications would make assessing graduate candidates more difficult, according to Deloitte.
The recommendations were announced in a report last week by the Burgess Group. The report suggests introducing a single document, a ‘Higher Education Achievement Report’ (HEAR), which would be the key vehicle for measuring and recording student achievement.
John Charlton, Graduate Recruitment Partner at Deloitte in Newcastle, said: “The current grade classification system does make it easier to differentiate between prospective employees. At Deloitte we receive in excess of 15,000 applications for 1,400 graduate and undergraduate positions which are assessed across a range of criteria. One of these criteria is for students to achieve a 2:1 degree. This provides students with clear and transparent information about our selection process.”
Deloitte said they recognised that the new report would be useful in assessing ‘marginal’ candidates, particularly those who narrowly miss out on the firm’s degree criteria.
The company also suggested that HEAR results should be made available before graduation. Many companies like Deloitte make job offers in advance, with the condition that the applicant achieves a specific level of qualification.
This was posted in Bdaily's Members' News section by Ruth Mitchell .
Enjoy the read? Get Bdaily delivered.
Sign up to receive our popular morning National email for free.
A game-changing move for digital-first innovators
Confidence the missing ingredient for growth
Global event supercharges North East screen sector
Is construction critical to Government growth plan?
Manufacturing needs context, not more software
Harnessing AI and delivering social value
Unlocking the North East’s collective potential
How specialist support can help your scale-up journey
The changing shape of the rental landscape
Developing local talent for a thriving Teesside
Engineering a future-ready talent pipeline
AI matters, but people matter more