Partner Article
?Business as usual' not enough for climate change
A ‘business-as-usual’ approach to the environment will mean that the North East will fail to meet Government obligations under the Climate Change Act and international agreements, a new study has found.
The North East England Greenhouse Gas Emissions Baselines and Trajectories Study measured the contribution that the region is making to local, national and international targets for the reduction of greenhouse gases. It found that the biggest source of emissions in the North East is from the industrial sector, and that trajectories to 2050 show an increase in emissions in the North East, particularly from transport.
The study highlighted that existing regional policies and actions will not deliver the reductions required for the North East to meet UK emissions reduction targets.
Wyn Jones OBE, Chair of Sustaine, launched the study. He said: “By 2050 our emissions will be nearly 39 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent and the obligation under the Climate Change Act means that the region needs to reduce this figure substantially.”
Jonathan Blackie, Regional Director at Government Office North East, said: “The region has already started to put itself in a strong position to tackle climate change. This study helps us to understand the scale of the challenge we face, and I hope that it will encourage regional and local partners and communities to make progress together. Local authority, business and community leadership will be essential to success.”
This was posted in Bdaily's Members' News section by Ruth Mitchell .
Enjoy the read? Get Bdaily delivered.
Sign up to receive our popular morning National email for free.
Are you a meat proxy?
Engaging the five-generation workplace
Talent is an asset, not an operational resource
Taking advantage of the opportunities ahead
Accountability isn’t the enemy of empathy
Act now to avoid a last-minute tax scramble
How inner-city living can transform a city by the sea
Artificial intelligence's value is the time it gives back
Why we must break the magnetic pull of London
AI scepticism is healthy - inaction isn't
What does NPPF mean for planning gain and pricing?
What new NPPF rules mean for landowners