Warehouse firm Segro rejects Prologis move
Warehouse property developer Segro has rejected a £12.6 billion takeover approach from US rival Prologis.
San Francisco-based Prologis has proposed buying FTSE 100 firm Segro in a deal worth £9.25 a share.
The move was rejected yesterday (June 23).
It is understood Segro shareholders would own around 10.5 per cent of the combined group under the deal.
Segro – which has properties across London and the Midlands – said the approach “falls a long way short of its views on value” and was “opportunistically timed”, adding the business has a “clear strategy, supported by a strong balance sheet and a proven operating platform.”
Prologis said “the combination is a highly compelling opportunity for Segro shareholders”.
The suitor has until 5pm on July 22 to make a firm bid for Segro or walk away under City takeover rules.
The offer comes amid a flurry of takeover tilts for UK firms, with budget carrier EasyJet rebuffing US investment fund Castlelake’s £4.74 billion takeover approach on Monday, and UK-listed laboratory testing company Intertek agreeing a £9.5 billion takeover by Swedish investor EQT.
Want your business, product or service to be seen regionally and nationally? Bdaily helps you get your story in front of the right audience, every day. Find out how Bdaily can help →
Join more than 55,000 subscribers by signing up to our daily bulletin each morning here.
Enjoy the read? Get Bdaily delivered.
Sign up to receive our popular morning London email for free.
Have we made it harder for young people to succeed?
Celebrating Nissan's North East success story
Are you a meat proxy?
Engaging the five-generation workplace
Talent is an asset, not an operational resource
Taking advantage of the opportunities ahead
Accountability isn’t the enemy of empathy
Act now to avoid a last-minute tax scramble
How inner-city living can transform a city by the sea
Artificial intelligence's value is the time it gives back
Why we must break the magnetic pull of London
AI scepticism is healthy - inaction isn't