Partner Article
Bid to revive declining local bus services
Nexus and the Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Authority today set out the case for local control of local buses in a bid to attract more passengers back to the network.
On the 20th anniversary of bus deregulation, the bus operators say that action is needed if buses in Tyne and Wear are ever going to be a realistic alternative to the car. Figures from Nexus reveal that passenger numbers have fallen by 58.7% in 20 years and fares have increased by 40%.
Bernard Garner, the Director General of Nexus, said: “The bus is central to meeting the challenge of congestion and environment change. “Passengers are deserting the bus, and we need a change of direction if it is to be a realistic alternative to the car – as well as serving those who rely on public transport. And yet passenger numbers are up in London, where the network is planned by a local transport authority. The evidence is clear we need the constraints imposed on Nexus by current legislation lifted, allowing us to build new relationships with bus companies as the way forward for Tyne and Wear.”
He continued: “We are very hopeful the Government will untie our hands, and set out a legal framework that lets us build a new relationship in the interests of the passenger and the economy of the region.”
Nexus is proposing forming partnerships with private operators to achieve the best possible value for money for the taxpayer.
This was posted in Bdaily's Members' News section by Ruth Mitchell .
Enjoy the read? Get Bdaily delivered.
Sign up to receive our popular morning National email for free.
Are you a meat proxy?
Engaging the five-generation workplace
Talent is an asset, not an operational resource
Taking advantage of the opportunities ahead
Accountability isn’t the enemy of empathy
Act now to avoid a last-minute tax scramble
How inner-city living can transform a city by the sea
Artificial intelligence's value is the time it gives back
Why we must break the magnetic pull of London
AI scepticism is healthy - inaction isn't
What does NPPF mean for planning gain and pricing?
What new NPPF rules mean for landowners