Partner Article
Family plans could damage prospects
More than three-quarters of bosses would not take on a woman recruit if they knew she would fall pregnant within six months of starting the job, a survey has revealed. Manchester-based Employment Law Advisory Services commissioned the poll of 1,100 company bosses and personnel managers after finding it was dealing with an increase in the number of cases involving pregnancy and new employees.
These included cases where candidates were asked in interview if they had plans for a family (a question prohibited by sex discrimination laws) and jobs withdrawn between interview and starting the post because of a pregnancy.
The UK-wide survey of male and female bosses and personnel managers found that during the selection process just over half will weigh up the chances of a candidate getting pregnant. They will take into account age and whether the interviewee has just got married - although a direct question to a prospective member of staff cannot be asked.
The ELAS survey found 68% would like more rights to quiz candidates about their plans for a family. Only 5% of the bosses have employed someone knowing the candidate is pregnant and 86% said they would feel cheated if someone started a job and announced within weeks they were pregnant.
This was posted in Bdaily's Members' News section by Ruth Mitchell .
Enjoy the read? Get Bdaily delivered.
Sign up to receive our popular morning National email for free.
Taking advantage of the opportunities ahead
Accountability isn’t the enemy of empathy
Act now to avoid a last-minute tax scramble
How inner-city living can transform a city by the sea
Artificial intelligence's value is the time it gives back
Why we must break the magnetic pull of London
AI scepticism is healthy - inaction isn't
What does NPPF mean for planning gain and pricing?
What new NPPF rules mean for landowners
The hidden cost squeezing Britain's economy
Teesside deserves more than cashback devolution
Construction must be built on commercial discipline