Partner Article
Paid-for content endures shaky start
THE Times has lost 66% of its online readership following the introduction of a paywall, according to reports, as bdaily readers kick the notion of paid-for content into touch.
Rupert Mudroch, head of News International, the media group that controls The Times last year announced the company’s decision to implement a paywall around both The Times and The Sunday Times.
Industry experts had predicted a 90% fall in readers, but, according to recent data compiled by Experian Hitwise, The Times had received 66% less visits than its pre-registration level, before 2 July.
According to Experian, the biggest fall happened five weeks before the paywall was implemented, when visitors were asked to register on the website to access content. During this period, the site lost 58% of visitors.
Currently, News International only charges £1 for the first 30 days of access to the websites, but Murdoch aims to to increase the price to £1 per day or £2 per week, after the introductory period expires.
Meanwhile, we asked bdaily readers whether they were willing to pay for online national news and sport content, with 95.2% answering ‘no’.
With only four readers willing to pay to keep up to speed with the news, it seems it may be some time before The Times can persuade great numbers through its paywall.
GO TO bdaily.info to take part in our latest poll.
This was posted in Bdaily's Members' News section by Ruth Mitchell .
Enjoy the read? Get Bdaily delivered.
Sign up to receive our popular morning National email for free.
Talent is an asset, not an operational resource
Taking advantage of the opportunities ahead
Accountability isn’t the enemy of empathy
Act now to avoid a last-minute tax scramble
How inner-city living can transform a city by the sea
Artificial intelligence's value is the time it gives back
Why we must break the magnetic pull of London
AI scepticism is healthy - inaction isn't
What does NPPF mean for planning gain and pricing?
What new NPPF rules mean for landowners
The hidden cost squeezing Britain's economy
Teesside deserves more than cashback devolution