Partner Article
E-cigarettes; what’s your policy?
Apparently sales of e-cigarettes grew by 340 per cent in 2013 and in the UK around 1.3 million people are now ‘vaping’.
The demand for e-cigarettes appears to be insatiable, although there is some doubt about their long-term health benefits.
As e-smokers are categorised by law as non-smokers, this leaves employers in a dilemma about how to handle e-smokers at work.
- Should e-smokers be allowed to smoke at their desk or place of work?
- Should e-smokers be required to share the same, usually outdoor, smoking areas as regular smokers?
In specific circumstances it may be reasonable to allow e-smokers to smoke at their desk or place of work. However, depending on the company culture and other factors, allowing e-smokers to smoke at their desk or place of work may not be appropriate.
Mixing e-smokers with regular smokers could violate their right to a smoke-free environment. Potentially this could give rise to grievances or at worst, claims for constructive dismissal.
The most suitable outcome to any problems associated with e-smokers would be to incorporate an e-smoking policy in to an existing smoking policy. And, if there’s an existing smoking area for regular smokers, set aside a separate facility for e-smokers.
By making these simple but effective changes, the potential for problems with e-smoking will successfully be avoided.
This was posted in Bdaily's Members' News section by The Business Medic .
Enjoy the read? Get Bdaily delivered.
Sign up to receive our daily bulletin, sent to your inbox, for free.
Taking advantage of the opportunities ahead
Accountability isn’t the enemy of empathy
Act now to avoid a last-minute tax scramble
How inner-city living can transform a city by the sea
Artificial intelligence's value is the time it gives back
Why we must break the magnetic pull of London
AI scepticism is healthy - inaction isn't
What does NPPF mean for planning gain and pricing?
What new NPPF rules mean for landowners
The hidden cost squeezing Britain's economy
Teesside deserves more than cashback devolution
Construction must be built on commercial discipline